PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
1,931 products · 9,275 snapshots
Second Eyes

Second Eyes

Strong signal

Automatically shortlist photos for faster publishing

Launched 1d ago
Signal
64
Velocity
0

What this means

+1900%Launching in a 1900% WoW growing category.
Data & Analytics had 20 launches this week vs 1 last.
17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
17%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
65range 49–88
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
1.2×
26 Productivity launches

About

Second Eyes helps you sort photos, understand the shortlist, and make the final call. For business briefs or personal needs, see why each photo was shortlisted and what still needs checking. You decide what to publish. Explore a real media editorial project involving 404 source files, then try six public sample photos to see how your requirements reshape the shortlist. This demo uses a recorded review. No uploads yet. Would you use this with your own photos? Share your workflow in the comments.

AI Summary

Second Eyes is a photo sorting tool that automatically generates a shortlist for easier publishing decisions. It provides insights into the selection process while allowing users to review and finalize their choices.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement34
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
135/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Trend20%50
carried 27%
Business15%17
carried 20%
Novelty15%9
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking6 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisProductivity
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Vaishnavi K
Vaishnavi K
@vaishnavi_212
rep 22
Crystal Chang
@crystal32378 · hunter

Topics

OpenAI DayPhotographyGitHubProductivityData & Analytics