pr-risk-score

Quiet signal

Risk-score pull requests so only the risky ones need a human

Launched 9d ago

Signal

Velocity

What this means

0%Vote pace is below typical for AI Agents.

Running at 0% of comparable launches.

15Founder Conviction Index: 15 — low signal.

Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

2.1×Founder historically performs 2.1× the median launch we track.

Best prior launch: CC Auto Review, attention 64.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability

today

Projected end-of-day votes

3range 2–4

Trajectory

stable

Vote pace holding steady.

Speed vs peers

0×

27 AI Agents launches

About

Paste a GitHub PR URL, get a 0-100 risk score and a decision: AI review is enough, or a human must look. A deterministic baseline (auth, migrations, CI, secrets, test gaps) plus a bounded Claude review, every point traced to file:line. Free and open source.

AI Summary

pr-risk-score analyzes GitHub pull requests by providing a risk score from 0 to 100, indicating whether AI review suffices or a human review is necessary. It combines a deterministic baseline assessment with an AI review, ensuring traceability for each score component.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0

Vote pace vs average

Momentum0

Sustained over 6h

Virality0

Spread × engagement

Engagement—

not measured

Signal sources

2 of 6 active

Launch tracking7 readings since we picked it up
AI analysisAI Agents
Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
Revenue signalsno match on this domain
Editorial scoringbelow the signal threshold for this pass

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.