PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
7,435 products · 35,414 snapshots
Plugins Radar

Plugins Radar

Notable signal

Search rankings and competitor alerts for ChatGPT plugins

Launched 1d ago
Signal
56
Velocity
0

What this means

50%Vote pace is below typical for AI Agents.
Running at 50% of comparable launches.
-26%Category cooling: Analytics.
Launches down 26% week-over-week.
22Founder Conviction Index: 22 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
14%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
76range 57–103
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
0.5×
3 AI Agents launches

About

Plugins Radar tracks the ChatGPT plugin directory. Look up any of 5,000+ plugins to see where it ranks in 192 common searches, which plugins compete with it and which searches it misses. Add your plugin and the rivals you watch, and get an email when one passes you or edits its listing. Topic leaderboards are free. Sign up free and track a plugin to see its full report.

AI Summary

Plugins Radar provides analytics for over 5,000 ChatGPT plugins, tracking their search rankings across 192 common queries. Users can monitor competitor performance and receive alerts for changes in rankings or listings.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement5
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
125/8
Timeliness5%94
carried 7%
Novelty15%65
carried 20%
Trend20%30
carried 27%
Business15%3
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking8 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Konstantin Danovsky
Konstantin Danovsky
@konstantin_danovsky1
rep 23
Dmitry Nehaychik
@_nixa_ · hunter

Topics

AnalyticsSEOArtificial Intelligence