PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
4,573 products · 21,471 snapshots
OpenScience

OpenScience

Early signal

The open-source AI workbench for scientific research

Launched 1d ago
Signal
37
Velocity
0

What this means

10%Vote pace is below typical for AI Agents.
Running at 10% of comparable launches.
Rising steadily
Steady upward velocity sustained.
-56%Category cooling: Science.
Launches down 56% week-over-week.
16Founder Conviction Index: 16 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
4%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
18range 14–24
Trajectory
rising
Steady upward velocity sustained.
Speed vs peers
0.1×
8 AI Agents launches

About

OpenScience is an open-source AI agent for scientific research. It reads papers, writes and runs code, works in notebooks and a terminal, and sends long jobs to Modal, your own servers, or a Slurm/PBS cluster. Give it a metric and Autoresearch runs experiments, logs every one, and keeps hill-climbing. Use 30+ models through one wallet, sign in with ChatGPT, or run a local model. It ranks #1 on agentic scientific research benchmarks. Free and open source.

AI Summary

OpenScience is an open-source AI platform designed for scientific research, capable of reading papers, executing code, and managing experiments across various computing environments. It supports over 30 models and ranks first in agentic scientific research benchmarks.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement11
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
85/8
Timeliness5%96
carried 7%
Novelty15%38
carried 20%
Trend20%30
carried 27%
Business15%3
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking7 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring0% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Aayam Bansal
Aayam Bansal
@aayambansal
rep 19
Ishaan Gangwani
@ishaan_gangwani · hunter

Topics

Artificial IntelligenceScienceOpen Source