PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
8,737 products · 42,138 snapshots
Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder

Strong signal

Meta’s most capable models for personal agents

Launched 12h ago
Signal
65
Velocity
0

What this means

9×Growing 9× faster than the typical AI Agents launch.
Compared to 3 AI Agents launches at the same age.
51%Mid-tier finish likely.
Projecting attention of 199 by end of day-1.
Low discussion activity despite the attention.
Audience is voting but not engaging — could signal weak product-market fit.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
51%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
199range 149–269
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
9×
3 AI Agents launches

About

Muse Wonder is Meta’s new model series for personal and professional agents, with two models: Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full. Active Memory carries your context across conversations, Active Focus keeps working through blockers on hard goals, and it adds domain expertise in law, finance, and health plus stronger coding. Muse Wonder is live on the Meta Model API and Muse Code. Muse Wonder Full is for Muse Code subscribers.

AI Summary

Muse Wonder is Meta's latest model series designed for personal and professional agents, featuring two variants: Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full. It includes capabilities like Active Memory, Active Focus, and domain expertise in law, finance, and health, and is available on the Meta Model API and Muse Code.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum25
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement2
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
105/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Trend20%30
carried 27%
Novelty15%21
carried 20%
Business15%16
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking4 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Rohan Chaubey
@rohanrecommends · hunter

Topics

Artificial Intelligence