PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
4,611 products · 21,921 snapshots
MuM

MuM

Notable signal

A reading-first Markdown engine for macOS

Launched 13h ago
Signal
57
Velocity
0

What this means

17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
21%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
91range 68–123
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
1.2×
8 Developer Infrastructure launches

About

Your Markdown lives in a dozen folders. Most of the time you don't want to write — you just want to read one section. Every Markdown tool is a writing app with a preview pane. MuM is the opposite: a native macOS reader with no web engine inside — all AppKit. Several projects open at once, each remembering where you stopped. Cross-project search. Typesetting tuned for CJK as well as Latin. ~0.3s cold start, 1.7 MB download, 100+ fps scrolling a 5 MB document. Open source, MIT.

AI Summary

MuM is a native macOS Markdown reader designed for efficient reading rather than writing, featuring cross-project search and optimized typesetting for CJK and Latin scripts. It is open source under the MIT license, with a cold start time of approximately 0.3 seconds and capable of scrolling 5 MB documents at over 100 fps.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum3
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement4
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
115/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%51
carried 20%
Trend20%30
carried 27%
Business15%2
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking4 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisDeveloper Infrastructure
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

IceskYsl
@iceskysl
rep 23
IceskYsl
@iceskysl · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsGitHubOpen Source