PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
2,909 products · 13,612 snapshots
Milliseconds.ai

Milliseconds.ai

Strong signal

Fast AI decisions on text and images, via one API

Launched 1d ago
Signal
63
Velocity
0

What this means

+94%Launching in a 94% WoW growing category.
Artificial Intelligence had 660 launches this week vs 341 last.
13Founder Conviction Index: 13 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
19%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
89range 67–120
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
1×
11 AI Agents launches

About

Text and images in. Labels, categories, structured fields and decisions out. Meet decision-machine-1, the small model behind milliseconds.ai. Route emails, extract invoice data, apply return policies (or build your hot-dog identification empire). One fast API. $0.04 per million input tokens. Output tokens are free. Get 125M free input tokens every month on test keys.

AI Summary

Milliseconds.ai offers a single API for processing text and images, providing labels, categories, and structured data outputs. The service charges $0.04 per million input tokens, with 125 million free tokens available monthly for testing.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement13
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
155/8
Timeliness5%96
carried 7%
Trend20%49
carried 27%
Novelty15%45
carried 20%
Business15%7
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking7 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Nina Yujiri
Nina Yujiri
@ninayujiri
rep 23
Baptiste Laget
@baptistelaget · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsArtificial IntelligenceAPI