PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
6,816 products · 32,267 snapshots
mcpgawk

mcpgawk

Notable signal

Catch MCP servers that change after you approved them

Launched 9h ago
Signal
52
Velocity
0

What this means

17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
16%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
70range 53–95
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.
Speed vs peers
1×
6 Developer Infrastructure launches

About

An MCP server can change what its tools do after you approved it. Your agent will call the new one and never notice. mcpgawk records a baseline of every MCP server your agents use, checks behaviour in a sandbox, and sits in the path: once a tool's description or power changes, the call is refused until you decide. The agent cannot approve its own way past it. Everything runs on your machine. Nothing is uploaded. Free CLI, VS Code extension and MCP server. The gateway tier has a 7-day trial.

AI Summary

mcpgawk monitors MCP servers for unauthorized changes post-approval by recording a baseline and checking behavior in a sandbox. It operates locally, ensuring no data is uploaded, and includes a free CLI, VS Code extension, and a 7-day trial for the gateway tier.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement3
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
85/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Trend20%34
carried 27%
Novelty15%12
carried 20%
Business15%1
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisDeveloper Infrastructure
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Neelagiri Chettiyar
@neelagiri_chettiyar
rep 22
Neelagiri Chettiyar
@neelagiri_chettiyar · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsGitHubSecurity