PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
7,165 products · 34,067 snapshots
Linda

Linda

Notable signal

Your local AI coworker for the Mac, like Dots but free!

Launched 15h ago
Signal
60
Velocity
0

What this means

50%Vote pace is below typical for AI Agents.
Running at 50% of comparable launches.
13Founder Conviction Index: 13 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
15%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
74range 56–100
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
0.5×
3 AI Agents launches

About

Linda is a free, private AI coworker for your Mac. Say or type what you need and it does the work in its own browser and your folders: research, price checks, pages, sheets, renamed files, replies. Set up specialists, like a Researcher or a Bookkeeper, with their own instructions and skills. Watch every step in the Computer column and take over any time. It runs local AI on Apple Silicon or uses your own key, and asks before it sends, buys, deletes or posts. No account.

AI Summary

Linda is a free AI assistant for Mac that performs tasks such as research, price checks, and file management directly on your device. It operates locally on Apple Silicon or with your own key, ensuring privacy and control without the need for an account.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum4
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement14
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
95/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Trend20%31
carried 27%
Business15%7
carried 20%
Novelty15%6
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking4 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Jack Rossi
@jackrossi · hunter

Topics

MacArtificial IntelligenceProductivity