PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
7,469 products · 35,860 snapshots
judged.systems

judged.systems

Notable signal

The judgment API platform for support systems.

Launched 1d ago
Signal
55
Velocity
0

What this means

14.2×Growing 14.2× faster than the typical AI Agents launch.
Compared to 3 AI Agents launches at the same age.
17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
28%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
71range 53–96
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
14.2×
3 AI Agents launches

About

Support systems call judged.systems when a ticket needs a judgment. The helpdesk stays the system of record. You send the ticket. A pack defines the questions: queue, urgency, refund request, policy risk. Back comes a choice and its probabilities, a score on a rubric, or the probability a statement is true. Your thresholds return accept or review. A failed call stays in review. The ticket is redacted first. The evaluation is stored as it happened. A label on a miss leaves it untouched.

AI Summary

Judged.systems is an API platform that provides judgment capabilities for support systems, allowing helpdesks to assess tickets based on predefined criteria. It returns evaluations, probabilities, and scores while maintaining the original ticket's integrity and storing the evaluation process.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement6
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Judged.systems scores a signal of 55 for its unique judgment API.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
215/8
Surprising

signal 55 out of 100

Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%85
carried 20%
Story20%76
carried 27%
Trend20%30
carried 27%
Business15%3
carried 20%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking6 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Oleksandr Halashevskyi
@ohalashevskyi
rep 23
Oleksandr Halashevskyi
@ohalashevskyi · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsArtificial Intelligence