PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
7,642 products · 36,306 snapshots
inkling

inkling

Notable signal

open-source AI assistant for your WhatsApp group chats

Launched 9h ago
Signal
45
Velocity
0

What this means

+62%Launching in a 62% WoW growing category.
Calendar had 21 launches this week vs 13 last.
17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.
4.8×Founder historically performs 4.8× the median launch we track.
Best prior launch: Bevell, attention 79.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
11%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
16range 12–22
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.

About

inkling is an open-source, private personal AI assistant that lives in your WhatsApp. Add inkling to any WhatsApp chat, then text or voice-note it like a friend. It suggests spots, runs polls, finds a time that works for everyone and sends the invites. Open source: self-host it, and nothing trains on your chats.

AI Summary

Inkling is an open-source AI assistant designed for WhatsApp group chats, facilitating scheduling, polls, and recommendations. It prioritizes privacy by allowing users to self-host the assistant, ensuring that no data from chats is used for training.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement75
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
126/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 6%
Trend20%42
carried 24%
Founder10%31
carried 12%
Business15%20
carried 18%
Novelty15%9
carried 18%
Story20%0
carried 24%
Not measured · 2 of 8
Revenue10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 6 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring22% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Natalie Chan
Natalie Chan
@natal1e_c
rep 27
Joon Sang Lee
@joonsang_lee · hunter

Topics

CalendarGitHubEmailMessaging