PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
9,264 products · 44,383 snapshots
GLM-Legal

GLM-Legal

Notable signal

Z.ai’s legal AI model for contract review and compliance

Launched 8h ago
Signal
61
Velocity
0

What this means

Low discussion activity despite the attention.
Audience is voting but not engaging — could signal weak product-market fit.
-43%Category cooling: Legal.
Launches down 43% week-over-week.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
27%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
124range 93–167
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.

About

LM-Legal is Z.ai’s legal AI model, built on GLM-5.3-Flash and trained for agentic legal work like contract review, evidence analysis, and compliance research. Z.ai added legal mid-training, then reinforcement learning across tens of thousands of legal task environments. It passes 19.17% of tasks on Harvey’s Legal Agent Benchmark per Vals AI, up from 6.67% for the base model. API access is application-only beta

AI Summary

GLM-Legal is Z.ai's AI model designed for legal tasks such as contract review and compliance, built on GLM-5.3-Flash. It has shown improved performance, passing 19.17% of tasks on Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark, and is currently available through application-only beta API access.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement3
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
155/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%71
carried 20%
Trend20%31
carried 27%
Business15%22
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Rohan Chaubey
@rohanrecommends · hunter

Topics

LegalArtificial Intelligence