PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
8,676 products · 41,689 snapshots
Genchi

Genchi

Notable signal

Project delivery predictions, from the people doing the work

Launched 8h ago
Signal
60
Velocity
0

What this means

17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
20%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
74range 56–100
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.

About

Genchi shows engineering leaders a prediction of which projects are heading for a missed deadline and which aren't, from the people doing the work. We've rebuilt it from the ground up. Team members vote with one anonymous click in Slack. Leaders see a combined score for every and trend in one portfolio view, so they know where to step in and which teams to leave alone. Genchi works with Jira and Asana. You can see your live portfolio inside Claude, ChatGPT and Grok. Free for teams of up to 10.

AI Summary

Genchi provides engineering leaders with project delivery predictions based on team member input via anonymous voting in Slack. It integrates with Jira and Asana, offering a consolidated view of project status and trends, and is free for teams of up to 10.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement14
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
135/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%50
carried 20%
Trend20%30
carried 27%
Business15%7
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisWorkflow / Automation
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Rowland Savage
@rowland
rep 23
Rowland Savage
@rowland · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsGitHub