PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
3,739 products · 17,531 snapshots
Fit Receipt

Fit Receipt

Notable signal

A private fitting agent that knows when to call JEV

Launched 9h ago
Signal
58
Velocity
0

What this means

+100%Launching in a 100% WoW growing category.
Vercel Day had 103 launches this week vs 0 last.
14Founder Conviction Index: 14 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
14%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
65range 49–88
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.
Speed vs peers
0.8×
11 AI Agents launches

About

Try on lingerie virtually; every pick has an AI judgment receipt. Fit Receipt is a reference implementation. The agent handles chat; code protects facts and pricing. JEV (TypeSafe) is a judgment model that scores trade-offs with calibrated confidence in ~300ms—not essays. Low-confidence results stay unresolved; judgments are recorded; works without JEV. Photos stay in your browser; no server photo storage. JEV sees typed fields, never the photo. Rate-limited API. Vercel + open source.

AI Summary

Fit Receipt is a virtual fitting agent that uses AI to provide judgment receipts for lingerie selections, scoring trade-offs with a model called JEV. It operates without server photo storage, ensuring user privacy, and features a rate-limited API for integration.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement12
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
166/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 6%
Novelty15%53
carried 18%
Trend20%50
carried 24%
Founder10%30
carried 12%
Business15%6
carried 18%
Story20%0
carried 24%
Not measured · 2 of 8
Revenue10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 6 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring25% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Crystal Chang
@crystal32378
rep 28
Jothsna Sri Kathyayani
Jothsna Sri Kathyayani
@icexdonut
rep 22
Crystal Chang
@crystal32378 · hunter

Topics

Vercel DayDeveloper ToolsProductivityFashion