PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
8,976 products · 43,035 snapshots
Epherem

Epherem

Strong signal

Find login and database flaws in your AI-built app

Launched 8h ago
Signal
62
Velocity
0

What this means

+100%Launching in a 100% WoW growing category.
Google Cloud Run had 53 launches this week vs 0 last.
22Founder Conviction Index: 22 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
17%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
70range 53–95
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.
Speed vs peers
1.1×
5 comparable launches

About

Epherem is a free source code security scanner for apps built with AI. It checks for common security issues involving authentication, database access, exposed API keys and vulnerable packages. Upload a ZIP or connect a GitHub repository to scan your app. Findings include plain-English explanations, suggested fixes and prompts you can paste into Claude Code, Lovable or Cursor. Reports can also be exported for review with your AI coding assistant, including issues the scanner couldn't verify.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement20
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
175/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%61
carried 20%
Trend20%50
carried 27%
Business15%10
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

2 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisnot yet enriched
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Kirtik
@kirtik
rep 22
Kirtik
@kirtik · hunter

Topics

Vibe codingGoogle Cloud RunDeveloper ToolsGitHub