PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
4,952 products · 23,720 snapshots
Curie

Curie

Strong signal

Assistant for scientific literature and document analysis.

Launched 1d ago
Signal
63
Velocity
0

What this means

-30%Category cooling: Artificial Intelligence.
Launches down 30% week-over-week.
17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
24%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
99range 74–134
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.

About

Curie is an AI research assistant built for real scientific work, not a generalist chatbot. It searches PubMed, arXiv, Europe PMC, OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar in parallel, then verifies every claim against the source text, so you see what's backed and what isn't. Point it at a document to extract structured data with the quote behind each value, or run a full systematic review, protocol, screening, PRISMA diagram, with you approving every decision. Projects and a library keep it organized.

AI Summary

Curie is an AI research assistant designed for scientific literature analysis, capable of searching multiple databases and verifying claims against source texts. It offers features for structured data extraction and systematic reviews, while maintaining project organization through a library system.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement10
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
145/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%50
carried 20%
Trend20%31
carried 27%
Business15%12
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking6 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisEducation
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Víctor Madarnás
@vimagoo
rep 24
Víctor Madarnás
@vimagoo · hunter

Topics

EducationArtificial IntelligenceProductivity