PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
5,148 products · 24,169 snapshots
CrawlRaven MCP

CrawlRaven MCP

Strong signal

Your SEO work, done from your AI agent

Launched 8h ago
Signal
67
Velocity
0

What this means

1.9×Growing 1.9× faster than the typical AI Agents launch.
Compared to 14 AI Agents launches at the same age.
31%Mid-tier finish likely.
Projecting attention of 134 by end of day-1.
Low discussion activity despite the attention.
Audience is voting but not engaging — could signal weak product-market fit.
18Founder Conviction Index: 18 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
31%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
134range 101–181
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.
Speed vs peers
1.9×
14 AI Agents launches

About

CrawlRaven joins Search Console, GA4, your keyword lists, and a technical crawl of your site into one plan, ranked by impact: what to fix, update and write first. Ask for it in Claude, ChatGPT or Cursor through our MCP server and get answers from your own data.

AI Summary

CrawlRaven MCP integrates data from Search Console, GA4, keyword lists, and technical site crawls to prioritize SEO tasks based on impact. Users can query the system via AI agents like Claude, ChatGPT, or Cursor for tailored insights.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement7
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
95/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Trend20%32
carried 27%
Novelty15%6
carried 20%
Business15%4
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Rakesh Reddy
Rakesh Reddy
@rakesh_rry
rep 24
Ayush Chaturvedi
@ayushtweetshere · hunter

Topics

AnalyticsMarketingSEO