PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
3,471 products · 16,208 snapshots
ChoreDivider

ChoreDivider

Notable signal

Split chores by what each of you actually minds doing

Launched 8h ago
Signal
54
Velocity
0

What this means

2×Growing 2× faster than the typical Productivity launch.
Compared to 5 Productivity launches at the same age.
+200%Launching in a 200% WoW growing category.
Couples had 6 launches this week vs 2 last.
13Founder Conviction Index: 13 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
21%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
66range 50–89
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.
Speed vs peers
2×
5 Productivity launches

About

Every chore app asks how hard a chore is, once, for everyone. ChoreDivider asks each of you, in private: how draining is this for you? Ratings stay sealed until everyone is done. Then it deals each day so minutes stay even over 14 days and nobody gets the chore they dread. Every chore says, why it landed with you. No points, no leaderboard.

AI Summary

ChoreDivider is an iOS app designed for couples to fairly distribute household chores based on individual preferences and energy levels. It allows users to privately rate chores, ensuring an equitable division over a 14-day period without competition or public scoring.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement6
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
125/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Trend20%50
carried 27%
Novelty15%32
carried 20%
Business15%3
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisProductivity
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

PeterEsser_
@peteresser_ · hunter

Topics

CouplesProductivityiOS