PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
17,045 products · 82,562 snapshots
chat-recall

chat-recall

Strong signal

Ctrl+F for every conversation you've had with an AI

Launched 2mo ago
Signal
69
Velocity
0

What this means

+63%Launching in a 63% WoW growing category.
Security had 39 launches this week vs 24 last.
60%Strong buyer-intent signal in the discussion.
60% of commenters sound like potential buyers — mostly developers.
70%Comment sentiment overwhelmingly positive.
Audience strongly receptive — developers engaged.
Users are asking for conflicting context handling + key rotation assistance.
Feature requests surfaced from the comment thread.
Recurring concerns: limited assistant compatibility, complex architecture concerns.
Pain points raised more than once by different people.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
23%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
94range 71–127
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.

About

Your team has done months of work with AI assistants. Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode each keep a full record of it, in its own format, and none can read the others. One command reads what they wrote and turns it into one searchable history. Passwords come out before anything leaves your computer. Your assistant searches it itself, so it stops asking what you decided last month. It also finds keys that leaked into old chats, and checks which still work.

AI Summary

Chat-recall consolidates conversation histories from various AI assistants into a single searchable format, enhancing productivity for developers. It ensures security by processing data locally and identifying potential security risks, such as leaked keys.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement28
Discussion per unit of attention

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking5 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread analysed
  • Outside discussionwe looked, found nothing
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoringbelow the signal threshold for this pass

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

darkkraft
@darkkraft
rep 23
darkkraft
@darkkraft · hunter

Topics

Developer ToolsArtificial IntelligenceSecurity

Comment Intelligence· 7 comments analysed

Sentiment

Positive70%
Neutral20%
Negative10%
Buyer intent
60%
of commenters sound like potential buyers
Audience
developers
Sentiment over 62 days
Positive
Negative
Buyer intent
Overall vibe

Overall, commenters are excited about the time-saving potential, with some inquiries about integration and context management.

Top themes
  • search functionality
  • context management
  • integration with assistants
Feature requests
  • conflicting context handling
  • key rotation assistance
  • ChatGPT integration
Complaints
  • limited assistant compatibility
  • complex architecture concerns

Top comments

[REDACTED]
↑ 2

This is going to save me a lot of time when I try to look for chats about certain topics. Good luck!

[REDACTED]
↑ 1

Ctrl+F doesn't work on your brain. That was the whole problem I had. I run four assistants — Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and OpenCode — depending on the job. Each one keeps a complete record of everything it did. Each one is blind to the other three. So I kept re-explaining the same architecture, and twice I watched one rebuild something another had finished the week before. chat-recall reads what they already wrote and turns it into one searchable history. One command. The part I did not plan for is the leaked keys. Old chats are full of pasted credentials, and it now tells you which ones still work. A dead key is cleanup. A live one is an incident. Three things it does that I use every day: - A new laptop already knows everything. Sign in and the whole history is there. - Try a new assistant without starting over. Every add-on follows you across. - Bugs turn into tasks on their own, with the fix already sketched out. - Scan for passwords/secrets before sending any data. Free forever for one person, on your own hardware. $10 a month if we host it. The whole repo is source-available under Elastic License 2.0. Which assistant would you want indexed that I'm missing? I am happy to add more!

[REDACTED]
↑ 1

looks really cool and really OCD-friendly so i am gonna definitely subscribe. I have a question though. How does CR handle conflicting or outdated context? Like if Claude, Codex and Cursor reach different conclusions, or an earlier decision is later reversed, how does it determine the current source of truth, preserve provenance and prevent stale assumptions from being passed to the next "guy"?

[REDACTED]
↑ 1

Great work! I needed this because I don't remember anything

Sentiment computed via openrouter