PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
6,352 products · 30,467 snapshots
Capybara Court

Capybara Court

Strong signal

Tiny disputes, gently settled by a capybara judge

Launched 1d ago
Signal
66
Velocity
0

What this means

4.3×Growing 4.3× faster than the typical Consumer App launch.
Compared to 6 Consumer App launches at the same age.
30%Mid-tier finish likely.
Projecting attention of 85 by end of day-1.
-32%Category cooling: Lifestyle.
Launches down 32% week-over-week.
17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
30%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
85range 64–115
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
4.3×
6 Consumer App launches

About

Two people answer the same four questions about a small dispute. Each side is sealed; only Judge Cappy, a capybara, reads both. The ruling opens on both phones at once, fault never 100 to 0. Alone? Post to the gallery, names covered. It all shreds in 30 days.

AI Summary

Capybara Court is a mobile app for Android and iOS that facilitates the resolution of minor disputes through a unique judging process by a capybara. Users answer four questions about their disagreement, and the sealed ruling is revealed simultaneously on both devices, with anonymity preserved for solo submissions.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement21
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
145/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%59
carried 20%
Trend20%31
carried 27%
Business15%11
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking6 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisConsumer App
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring23% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Jungsik Byun
@jungsik_byun
rep 23
Jungsik Byun
@jungsik_byun · hunter

Topics

AndroidLifestyleiOS