PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
1,552 products · 7,035 snapshots
Amy by Jellyfish

Amy by Jellyfish

Notable signal

Your AI sourcing employee for recruiting teams

Launched 9h ago
Signal
54
Velocity
0

What this means

+100%Launching in a 100% WoW growing category.
Artificial Intelligence had 506 launches this week vs 0 last.
17Founder Conviction Index: 17 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
16%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
65range 49–88
Trajectory
stable
Not enough snapshots yet to detect trajectory.
Speed vs peers
1×
13 AI Agents launches

About

Amy an AI sourcer for recruiting agencies. She learns what a company needs, searches across LinkedIn, GitHub, Google Scholar, and anywhere else on the web for people who may be a good fit, and explains why. She sends personalized messages, follows up, handles replies, and sends interested, qualified candidates to the recruiter.

AI Summary

Amy by Jellyfish is an AI-powered sourcing tool designed for recruiting teams, automating candidate search and outreach across various platforms. It identifies suitable candidates based on company needs and manages communication, delivering qualified prospects to recruiters.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement6
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

InvestigateRanks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
155/8
Timeliness5%100
carried 7%
Novelty15%74
carried 20%
Trend20%50
carried 27%
Business15%3
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking2 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Jad El Asmar
Jad El Asmar
@jad_ea
rep 22
Symion John
@symj · hunter

Topics

Artificial IntelligenceHiring