PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
PHI
Sync
PHI
Startup Intelligence
Markets
  • Signal Feed
  • Startups
  • Categories
  • Founders
  • Revenue
  • Beyond the launch
Intelligence
  • Content Desk
  • Editorial QA
  • Ask Market
  • Signature Index
  • Trends
Lab
  • Metric Bench
  • Tagline Lab
  • Smart Search
Yours
  • Watchlist
  • Alerts
  • Search
Sync now
/
8,139 products · 38,995 snapshots
AgentDock

AgentDock

Notable signal

Answer Claude Code & Codex from one Inbox, in any terminal

Launched 1d ago
Signal
55
Velocity
0

What this means

13Founder Conviction Index: 13 — low signal.
Few of the conviction sub-signals (reputation, velocity, buyer-intent, tagline clarity) are firing yet.

Prediction

Top-5 finish probability
14%
today
Projected end-of-day votes
62range 47–84
Trajectory
stable
Vote pace holding steady.
Speed vs peers
0.8×
3 AI Agents launches

About

AgentDock keeps Claude Code, Codex and your other coding agents on the edge of your Mac's screen. See who's working, answer every question and permission prompt from one Inbox with a keystroke (typed straight into cmux, tmux, iTerm, WezTerm, kitty or herdr), and message any agent from any app with ⌥⌥. Finished work gets a recap, written on your Mac. No account; nothing leaves your Mac. $19 once, after a 7-day free trial.

AI Summary

AgentDock allows users to manage coding agents like Claude Code and Codex from a single inbox on their Mac, facilitating quick responses and messaging across various terminal applications. The product is available for a one-time fee of $19 after a 7-day free trial, with no account required and all data remaining on the user's device.

Attention & discussion velocity

Performance

Velocity0
Vote pace vs average
Momentum0
Sustained over 6h
Virality0
Spread × engagement
Engagement10
Discussion per unit of attention

Editorial read

Scored deterministically. Only candidates that fire a story trigger are sent to a model, so this one has no written angle.

ThinLittle evidence and no strong angle. Nothing to build on yet.
85/8
Timeliness5%96
carried 7%
Trend20%33
carried 27%
Novelty15%11
carried 20%
Business15%5
carried 20%
Story20%0
carried 27%
Not measured · 3 of 8
Revenue10%—
Founder10%—
Cross-platform5%—

Gaps in our data, not findings about the product. Their weight is redistributed across the 5 we did measure.

measuredmeasured, zeronot measured
Full audit →

Signal sources

3 of 6 active
  • Launch tracking7 readings since we picked it up
  • AI analysisAI Agents
  • Comment intelligencethread not yet analysed
  • Outside discussionnot checked — domain is a storefront or shared
  • Revenue signalsno match on this domain
  • Editorial scoring13% evidence coverage

A source that found nothing is a measurement. A source that has not run is a gap. Neither means the launch lacks the thing.

Founders

Tihomir Videnov
@tvidenov
rep 22
Tihomir Videnov
@tvidenov · hunter

Topics

MacDeveloper ToolsArtificial Intelligence