Editorial score
16.9
90th percentile of this pass
Evidence coverage
23%
5 of 8 dimensions measured
Model confidence
—
not classified
Surprise
46
attention vs fundamentals
Platform divergence
—
external side not measured
Investigate
Ranks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
How the score was built
Unmeasured dimensions are excluded from the average rather than counted as zero, so the remaining weights are renormalised. The share column is the weight each one actually carried.
| Dimension | Value | Base weight | Actual share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trend | 50 | 20% | 27% | |
| Story | 0 | 20% | 27% | |
| Novelty | 58 | 15% | 20% | |
| Business | 13 | 15% | 20% | |
| Revenue | not measured | 10% | — | |
| Founder | not measured | 10% | — | |
| Cross-platform | not measured | 5% | — | |
| Timeliness | 95 | 5% | 7% |
Not measured: Revenue, Founder, Cross-platform. These are gaps in our data, not findings about the product.
Why this is a story
TrendingHigh attention and high momentum.
No trigger fired. This candidate is ranked on its dimension scores alone, which is why it carries no angle.
Model brief
Not classified. Only the top candidates of each pass are sent to a model, so this one was scored deterministically and no further.
scored 2026-11-12T18:37:55.682Z