Cognition's coding model, 64% cheaper than Fable 5.1
View product page →Ranks high on little evidence. Worth a look, but verify before committing.
Unmeasured dimensions are excluded from the average rather than counted as zero, so the remaining weights are renormalised. The share column is the weight each one actually carried.
| Dimension | Value | Base weight | Actual share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trend | 50 | 20% | 25% | |
| Story | 80 | 20% | 25% | |
| Novelty | 89 | 15% | 19% | |
| Business | 0 | 15% | 19% | |
| Revenue | not measured | 10% | — | |
| Founder | not measured | 10% | — | |
| Cross-platform | 86 | 5% | 6% | |
| Timeliness | 100 | 5% | 6% |
Not measured: Revenue, Founder. These are gaps in our data, not findings about the product.
Cognition's SWE-2 is described as 64% cheaper than Fable 5.1.
Cognition's SWE-2 model is 64% cheaper than Fable 5.1.
scored 2026-09-13T08:39:00.287Z · classified 2026-09-13T08:39:00.287Z